Author Topic: Flat Earth Sun & Moon (Read 20180 times)

patrick jane · « **Reply #27 on:** March 17, 2021, 01:17:57 am »

Replicate the correct umbra and penumbra sizes for eclipses in a real, physical scaled down helio model.... Go. You'll quickly realize your model is a joke and only exist in imagination and on your computer. THAT USES THE SAROS CYCLE TO PREDICT ECLIPSES!!! NASA uses ONE person that uses the Saros cycle to predict eclipses. GUESS WHERE THE SAROS CYCLE CAME FROM? Babylonian, geocentric flat earthers, thousands of years before the first globe was invented. No, heliocentrism was never needed to predict eclipses and they still can't do it fully and accurately today without the need to fall back on the Saros cycle.

Antikythera Mechanism was also predicting eclipses, even the direction and the color, thousands of years before the first globe was invented. Follow up with my eclipse video as I show so much more. I also show many other odd paths of totalities, how they fit well on the AE map, and other anomalies. Again, a pin pointer shadow can't be replicated in real life like that. Scale out the earth and moon and a light source. Your shadow is going to be very wide and dispersed. Your umbra will still be huge. Path of totality should be covering up entire countries. You have to prove otherwise through real modeling, not hearsay and theory.

1. Run every example you find of claimed earthshine through forensics and explain and prove why the vast majority did not catch the moon approaching, during the entirety of the eclipse, and as it was leaving, when we should have most definitely been able to see the moon at one of those points in time, even through various spectrums. Examples have already been shown to be non-raw and edited. Little liars and shills like Soundly make me sick.

2. Explain why we seen no penumbra as we were told we would see. Prove why their diagrams of a conical shaped umbra makes sense at all, especially from a light source 93 million miles away, in which all the massive light rays are completely parallel when they reach the moon and earth.

3. Explain why it has repeatedly been shown by multiple people that moonlight has a cooling effect and is colder than all of the shadows around it and don't give me that radiative cooling bs or "you didn't do the experiment right" crap. You can do this yourself as well on a clear full moon for optimum results. Do it outside anywhere, out in the country is best, or in an old warehouse or building. Moonlight can even be several degrees cooler than it's immediate surrounding area and certainly is never warmer or warm in any way, when in fact it should ALWAYS contain a level of warmth, not cooling. Defies thermal dynamics if it was light reflected from the sun and radiative cooling is a horrible excuse.

patrick jane · « **Reply #28 on:** May 01, 2021, 07:42:33 am »

patrick jane forums

News:

User

Stats ezBlock

Author Topic: Flat Earth Sun & Moon (Read 20180 times)

patrick jane

Re: Flat Earth Sun & Moon

patrick jane

Re: Flat Earth Sun & Moon

patrick jane

Re: Flat Earth Sun & Moon

Related Topics

Recent Topics