+- +-

+- User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 114
Latest: Hazard
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 32986
Total Topics: 1301
Most Online Today: 81
Most Online Ever: 46271
(March 28, 2021, 08:01:47 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 2664
Total: 2664

Author Topic: To The Crazy Girl Desperate For Marriage // KNOW YOUR PURPOSE  (Read 3441 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary
To The Crazy Girl Desperate For Marriage // KNOW YOUR PURPOSE
« on: September 30, 2018, 04:53:00 pm »




To The Crazy Girl Desperate For Marriage // KNOW YOUR PURPOSE




To the crazy girl desperate for marriage. It's harddddd to be single when you just want love. Instead of living life... we somehow 'endure' it. Are you even a person if a man isn't saying how wonderful he thinks you are?! Yes you are. God tells you who you are and what you're supposed to be doing. When we learn who He's made us in Christ, we can find purpose, meaning, fulfillment... EVEN WHEN WE'RE SINGLE!

Romans 5:8
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.





Theology Forums : https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin :  https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php
Bitchute : https://www.bitchute.com/channel/xUZJpNWUz2T4/



Hearing, believing and trusting the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross; His death, burial and resurrection, the gospel of our salvation, seals us with that Holy Spirit of Promise. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise. 2 Peter 3:9 KJV - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV - Ephesians 1:10-14 KJV - Romans 10:9-10 KJV - Romans 10:13 - Romans 10:17 - Ephesians 1:7 KJV - Colossians 1:14 KJV -
« Last Edit: April 01, 2019, 07:22:24 am by patrick jane »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Scripter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 62
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 12
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
I wish to encourage any women who want to marry to do so, provided they understand that they may also want to seek a male identity and status in professional work etc., to a certain extent.  I say this because of how much decline there is in male-female marriage, in how high the out of wedlock birth rate has become and because of Prager's essay on the legacy of feminism.  Feminism is Marxism walking around telling women that they won't be happen unless they are identical to men (which, you have to admit, is at least something of a paradox.) 

If there is anything to learn from the classics of English literature for the past 200 years, it is that marriage needs to be about both love and money.  It is easy to ridicule marriages for money only ("marry money" demanded one countess in Thackeray's DR. THORNE), yet no less than Jane Austen failed to account for money in her romantic pursuits and decided against marriage (personally--it was always the final scene in her novels).  And as one bio-movie title puts it, MISS AUSTEN REGRETS. 
Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest13

  • Guest
Crazy Girl.
Desperate for marriage.

Yep, she's crazy.  ;D
Funny Funny x 1 View List

anna

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +223/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Combination
Feminism is Marxism walking around telling women that they won't be happen unless they are identical to men


That's not what feminism is about at all.   It's about equality, not identicalness.
Agree Agree x 1 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Scripter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 62
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 12
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
Everything I see is about identicalness.  There is no honor for women being child-raisers and -trainers and dependent financially on their husband. 

What would women need equality--as defined by that movement-- for?  They don't like men or the world of men, so why be equal?  And what would be the difference between equality and identicality in that case?

It was never an American ideal that everyone be identical.  Even the idea of people voting who had no business or ownership experience was very late coming, and only a ploy by Marxists to end-around and try to 'vote' Marxism in.  You can find background on this when reading about Paine.  The debate at the time was whether it was any good for people without business or ownership experience to vote, and of course not women, unless they were the owners (like Contessas and Duchesses).  Marxism has changed the appeal of this into equality-no-matter-what-actual-knowledge, like the communists on the tail end of WW2, immediately chanting 'one world, one mind, all equal.'  They completely overlook the realism needed to make actual business decisions with actual money.  It is all fantasizing. 

Scripter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 62
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 12
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
Four Legacies of Feminism
www.dennisprager.com
Tuesday, November 01, 2011
ShareThis
As we approach the 50th anniversary of the publication of Betty Friedan's feminist magnum opus, "The Feminine Mystique," we can have a perspective on feminism that was largely unavailable heretofore.
And that perspective doesn't make feminism look good. Yes, women have more opportunities to achieve career success; they are now members of most Jewish and Christian clergy; women's college sports teams are given huge amounts of money; and there are far more women in political positions of power. But the prices paid for these changes -- four in particular -- have been great, and they outweigh the gains for women, let alone for men and for society.
The first was the feminist message to young women to have sex just like men do. There's no reason for young women to lead a different sexual life than men, they were told. Just as men can have sex with any woman solely for the sake of physical pleasure, women ought to be able to enjoy sex with any man just for the fun of it. The notion that the nature of a woman is to hope for at least the possibility of a long-term commitment from a man she sleeps with has been dismissed as sexist nonsense.
As a result, vast numbers of young American women had and continue to have what are called hook-ups, and for some of them it's quite possible that no psychological or emotional price has been paid. But the majority of women who are promiscuous do pay prices. One is depression. New York Times columnist Roos Douthat recently summarized an academic study on the subject: "A young woman's likelihood of depression rose steadily as her number of partners climbed and the present stability of her sex life diminished."
Long before this study, I had learned from women callers to my radio show (an hour each week -- "The Male-Female Hour" -- is devoted to very honest discussion of sexual and other man-woman issues) that not only did female promiscuity coincide with depression, it also often had lasting effects on women's ability to enjoy sex. Many married women told me that in order to have a normal sexual relationship with their husbands, they had to work through the negative aftereffects of early promiscuity -- not trusting men, feeling used, seeing sex as unrelated to love and disdaining their husband's sexual overtures. And many said they still couldn't have a normal sex life with their husbands.
The second awful legacy of feminism has been the belief among women that they can and should postpone marriage until they develop their careers -- and that only then should they seriously consider looking for a husband. Thus, the decade or more during which women have the best chance to attract men is spent being preoccupied with developing a career. Again, I cite women callers to my radio show over the past 20 years who have sadly looked back at what they now, at age 40, regard as 20 wasted years. Sure, these frequently bright and talented women have a fine career. But most women are not programed to prefer a great career to a great man and a family. They feel they were sold a bill of goods at college and by the media.
And they were. It turns out that most women without a man do worse in life than fish without bicycles.
The third sad feminist legacy: So many women -- and men -- have bought into the notion that women should work outside the home that for the first time in American history, and perhaps world history, vast numbers of children are not primarily raised by their mothers or even by an extended family member. Instead they are raised for a significant part of their childhood by nannies and by workers at day care centers. Whatever feminists may say about their only advocating choices, everyone knows the truth: Feminism regards work outside the home as more elevating, honorable, and personally productive than full-time mothering and homemaking.
And the fourth awful legacy of feminism has been the de-masculinization of men. For all of higher civilization's recorded history, becoming a man was defined overwhelmngly as taking responsibility for a family. That notion -- indeed the notion of masculinity itself -- is regarded by feminism as the worst of sins: patriarchy.
Men need a role, or they become, as the title of George Gilder's classic book on single men describes them, "Naked Nomads." In little more than a generation, feminism has obliterated roles. If you wonder why so many men choose not to get married, the answer lies in large part in the contemporary devaluation of the husband and of the father -- of men as men, in other words. Most men want to be honored in some way -- as a husband, a father, a provider, as an accomplished something; they don't want merely to be "equal partners" with a wife.
In sum, thanks to feminism, very many women slept with too many men for their own happiness; posponed marriage too long to find the right man to marry; are having hired hands do much of the raising of their children; and now find they are dating boy-men because manly men are so rare.
Feminism exemplifies the truth of the saying, "Be careful what you wish for -- you may get it."


Scripter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 62
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 12
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
If you want more background on manipulating voting ages and categories, and how much effort Paine put into that, see my DESOLATED novel.

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=sanford+desolated

anna

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +223/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Combination
Everything I see is about identicalness.

To a hammer, everything's a nail.

Quote
There is no honor for women being child-raisers and -trainers and dependent financially on their husband. 

Is there honor for men being child-raisers?  I hope so.
Since when was being financially dependent on the household breadwinner a matter of honor? 

Quote
What would women need equality--as defined by that movement-- for?  They don't like men or the world of men, so why be equal?

Women who desire and appreciate equality don't like men or the world of men?  Where is that even coming from?

Quote
And what would be the difference between equality and identicality in that case?

As different as the distance in meaning between the two definitions.

Quote
It was never an American ideal that everyone be identical.

No one said it was.  It is, however, an American ideal that everyone be equal.

 
« Last Edit: October 21, 2018, 02:35:59 pm by anna »
Winner Winner x 1 View List

Scripter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 62
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 12
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
Please don't play games with equal vs identical when I can't see what you mean is the difference.  You're just sending back platitudes which is general beliefs without examples. 

What exactly is the sameness you want?

There are tons of examples of identicalness--obliviating gender differences.  The Marxist Left leads the way in destroying the genders.  To destroy the West and free markets.  It is the game plan.  Centralized government everywhere, hopefully, they say, globally.

Male and female are never going to be equal in performance, in emotion, in many many things.  I don't think women want to vote like men, I think Marxists want votes they can manipulate emotionally.  They want to create a 'husband-government' for all the women and get their votes.

I will never forget a close woman friend listening to the research report about 20 years ago about the 'amniotic estrogen wash' which basically makes males what they are in the womb--in their brains.  She thought there was no hope for the genders to be equal when she heard that.  Well, it is a fact of life like oxygen being 20.5% of our air.  But where (except Marxism) did she get the idea that they needed to be equal? 

Why not have men like Austen hoped for with all the 'living' (money) needed for a wife and children from the start?  Marxism doesn't want that because it doesn't need government.  any woman who is honest about what is important to her as a woman is not nearly as concerned with engineering that will colonize the moon as procedures and plans that make responsible kids into adults.  Or what Austen called virtue. 


Scripter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 62
  • Karma: +61/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 12
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
You have not answered how we have come to the point of minimizing the value of women who raise children well.  Your counter is a totally separate question, and an unacceptable jump.

Don't forget to absorb Prager. 

anna

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +223/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Combination
You have not answered how we have come to the point of minimizing the value of women who raise children well.  Your counter is a totally separate question, and an unacceptable jump.

Don't forget to absorb Prager.

No, I won't be absorbing Prager. 

What counter is an "unacceptable jump?"   You didn't include a quote.

anna

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
  • Karma: +223/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 7
    Badges: (View All)
    Combination
Please don't play games with equal vs identical when I can't see what you mean is the difference.  You're just sending back platitudes which is general beliefs without examples. 

Um... look at the dictionary definitions of equal and identical and you'll see they're not the same thing.

Women aren't looking for identicalness, they're looking for equality.  You're jumping boats midstream.

Quote
What exactly is the sameness you want?

There are tons of examples of identicalness--obliviating gender differences.  The Marxist Left leads the way in destroying the genders.  To destroy the West and free markets.  It is the game plan.  Centralized government everywhere, hopefully, they say, globally. I don't think women want to vote like men, I think Marxists want votes they can manipulate emotionally.  They want to create a 'husband-government' for all the women and get their votes.

How in the world does equality under the law lead to the destruction of the West and free markets?   :o

Quote
Why not have men like Austen hoped for with all the 'living' (money) needed for a wife and children from the start?  Marxism doesn't want that because it doesn't need government.  any woman who is honest about what is important to her as a woman is not nearly as concerned with engineering that will colonize the moon as procedures and plans that make responsible kids into adults.  Or what Austen called virtue.

So are you looking to dial women back to pre-19th. amendment days?  Is that next?  Do you think women should be allowed to vote?

guest13

  • Guest
What would women need equality--as defined by that movement-- for?
 

Because no one should be given limits based solely on their gender ... or have their liberties based solely on their gender ... 

Quote
They don't like men or the world of men, so why be equal?


What. A.  Crock.  Who told you this?  I have been a feminist since my early 20's ... AND A mom of three.  Equality is not defined by *more than or better than* so why not?

 
Quote
And what would be the difference between equality and identicality in that case?

Ego.  Loss of Power.  Of anyone who has a problem with women being allow the same rights as men.   My right allows me to vote.    It gives me equal rights insofar as custody of my children, my home, belongings, etc.

We do not live in a patriarchy.  Thank goodness.
Like Like x 2 Winner Winner x 1 View List

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
70 Replies
4210 Views
Last post September 11, 2022, 06:21:48 pm
by patrick jane
10 Replies
1544 Views
Last post October 24, 2020, 05:35:30 pm
by guest8
30 Replies
3264 Views
Last post August 24, 2022, 04:45:47 pm
by patrick jane
3 Replies
1608 Views
Last post April 30, 2022, 10:10:56 pm
by patrick jane

+-Recent Topics

Pre-Conception Existence - an intro by patrick jane
February 10, 2024, 07:42:15 am

Best Of | Tattooed Theist Ministry by patrick jane
February 06, 2024, 08:58:08 pm

Corinth by patrick jane
February 06, 2024, 08:56:41 pm

Prayer Forum by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 08:10:29 am

Robert Sepehr Scientist by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 08:04:18 am

Lion Of Judah by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 07:23:59 am

Scriptures - Verse Of The Day and Discussion by patrick jane
August 23, 2023, 05:15:09 am

The Underworld by patrick jane
June 06, 2023, 07:01:04 am

Your Favorite Music, Images and Memes by patrick jane
June 06, 2023, 03:36:53 am

Did Jesus Die on a Friday - Comments by rstrats
April 23, 2023, 01:39:22 pm

ROBERT SEPEHR - ANTHROPOLOGY - Myths and Mythology by patrick jane
April 23, 2023, 09:08:00 am

The Greatest Sermons by patrick jane
April 16, 2023, 04:27:45 am

Who am I? | Tattooed Theist (Channel Trailer) by patrick jane
April 13, 2023, 09:31:23 pm

Biblical Flat Earth and Cosmos by patrick jane
April 13, 2023, 05:18:58 am

Common Figure of Speech/Colloquial Language? by rstrats
April 06, 2023, 02:57:38 pm

Jon Rappoport On The "Vaccine" by bernardpyron
December 11, 2022, 11:43:44 am

Mark & La Shonda Songwriting by guest131
November 20, 2022, 10:35:08 pm

Christ Is Able To Transform Individuals, Bernard Pyron by bernardpyron
November 13, 2022, 12:36:04 am