+- +-

+- User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 114
Latest: Hazard
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 32986
Total Topics: 1301
Most Online Today: 757
Most Online Ever: 46271
(March 28, 2021, 08:01:47 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 818
Total: 818

Author Topic: Is the U.S. Under Judgment By God in 2022 For the National Sin of Abortion?  (Read 12223 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

bernardpyron

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 94
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 14
    Badges: (View All)
    Fourth year Anniversary
Is the U.S. Under Judgment By God in 2021 For the National Sin of Abortion?  Bernard Pyron, February 2, 2021

http://consistent-life.org/blog/index.php/2018/04/03/eugenics-roe-v-wade/

"The 1973 Supreme Court decisions that ended all legal protection of unborn children were based on eugenics. Despite that, comments about the decisions usually focus on privacy and women’s rights, not on eugenics. So we should look carefully at the ways in which eugenics shows up in the decisions.

"The appearance of eugenics in the abortion decisions that is easiest to see is the reference in a footnote to Buck v. Bell, the 1927 case that opened the floodgates for sterilizing people who were considered to be unfit. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects a “right to privacy” and that the decision to have an abortion is an exercise of this right. But, the Court stated, the right to privacy is not absolute; it can be limited in some cases, such as vaccination and sterilization. So the abortion decision was not about women’s rights; it cited a case permitting forced sterilization."

"The abortion decisions were written by Justice Harry Blackmun. His approach to abortion follows the lead of Glanville Williams. Glanville Williams, who taught law at Cambridge University, was a member of the Eugenics Society. In 1954, the Eugenics Society voted to support the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA), which set out to remove legal restrictions against abortion. Williams became president of the ALRA from 1962, and was successful within a few years; the British law was changed in 1967."

http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm

"The influence on the eugenicists on abortion in America is perhaps
best seen by comparing Roe v. Wade and a book by Professor Glanville
Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. The book is cited
repeatedly in the 1973 abortion decision, but the numerous citations
do not reveal the full extent of the influence. Justice Blackmun
lifted his whole argument from Williams, including the history of
abortion, ancient attitudes, the influence of Christianity, common
law, Augustine's and Aquinas' teaching, canon law and English
statutory law. And Williams was a member of the Eugenics Society. Roe v. Wade was based on eugenics."




« Last Edit: May 27, 2022, 06:48:04 pm by patrick jane »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Informative Informative x 1 View List

guest8

  • Guest
The Eugenics Movement In the History of American Medicine

The late David Rockefeller and other Globalists and members of the financial and corporate elite have been promoting population reduction for years.  Their population reduction movement is part of the Eugenics Movement,

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States

"The American eugenics movement was rooted in the biological
determinist ideas of Sir Francis Galton, which originated in the
1880s. Galton studied the upper classes of Britain, and arrived at the
conclusion that their social positions were due to a superior genetic
makeup. Early proponents of eugenics believed that, through
selective breeding, the human species should direct its own evolution."

 MEDICAL EUGENICS WAS FUNDED AND PROMOTED BY THE TOP FINANCIAL ELITE

"The American eugenics movement received extensive funding from
various corporate foundations including the Carnegie Institution,
Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman railroad fortune.[6] In 1906
J.H. Kellogg provided funding to help found the Race Betterment
Foundation in Battle Creek, Michigan."

In the book, Rockefeller Medicine Men: Medicine and Capitalism In
AMERICA, 1979, by E. Richard Brown, he says the current problems in
the U.S. health care system are due to the "marriage of modern
medicine to corporate capitalism."
"In the early years of the 20th century, Brown says that because
medical technology was expensive, doctors turned to the financial
elite for money. The Rockefeller family supplied a large part of the
money to fund medical technology, as well as medical research and
medical schools."

"Rockefeller University began in 1901 as the Rockefeller Institute for
medical Research. It began giving doctor's degrees in 1957. And the
Rockefeller University Hospital does basic as well as applied medical
research."

The Rockefellers were involved in the pharmaceutical drug industry and
helped to make American doctors into highly paid salesmen for
prescription drugs. Perhaps the Rockefellers and others in the ruling
elite helped give high status to American doctors, making them members of a somewhat elite class, to help fool the people into accepting the drugs
they promoted as cures for many diseases. After all, a highly
respected doctor with much image must know what he is doing in
prescribing drugs.

"And the light of a candle shall shine no more at all in thee; and the voice of the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived." Revelation 18: 23

Note that sorceries is a translation in Revelation 18: 23 of φαρμακεια, or pharmakeia. "For by thy pharmakeia were all peoples deceived."

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/…/armageddon-or-newa…/messages…

The financial elite, especially the Rockefellers, made the American
medical profession into a top-down system, where local doctors are
controlled from the top of society, the financial and corporate
elites. The Eugenics movement was a part of that financial and
corporate elite, a movement that in the top-down system influenced the
culture of American doctors and nurses.

THE CALIFORNIA EUGENICS MOVEMENT SPREAD TO HITLER'S NAZI GERMANY

According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States

"California eugenicists began producing
literature promoting eugenics and sterilization and sending it
overseas to German scientists and medical professionals. By 1933,
California had subjected more people to forceful sterilization than
all other U.S. states combined. The forced sterilization program
engineered by the Nazis was partly inspired by California's."

IN THE 20TH CENTURY EUGENICISTS PROMOTED POPULATION CONTROL AND ABORTION

http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm
"From 1952 on, a major part of the eugenics movement was the
population control movement."

"One of the organizations that promoted eugenics under the new
population rubric was the Population Council. It was founded in 1952
by John D. Rockefeller 3rd, and spent $173,621,654 in its first 25
years. That is not a bad budget for one of the organizations in a dead
movement! Clearly, the people who think the eugenics movement died in
the rubble in Berlin do not understand crypto-eugenics, genetics or
population control."

"The coercive Chinese policy has a great deal of acceptance and
support in the United States, including from feminist leaders like
Eleanor Smeal and Molly Yard. When the Reagan administration cut off
funds for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) because of its
support for the Chinese population program, two American organizations
sued to restore funds: Rockefeller's Population Council and the
Population Institute in Washington. A 1978 survey of members of the
Population Association of America found that 34 percent of members
agreed that "coercive birth control programs should be initiated in at
least some countries immediately."

"In fact, the United States government is responsible for much of the
global population control. "

CIRCUMCISION AND THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT

In the very late 19th century Doctor Peter Charles Remondino took up
the cause of routine infant circumcision. Remondino was influenced by
the theory of Charles Darwin and as a result believed that male
infants should be circumcised to perfect a fault in human evolution of
the male reproductice organ..

https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Male-Infant-Circumcision-Brief-Overview-of-Issues.pdf

"Circumcision is an ancient cultural imposition on males that was adapted as a surgical operation - on the English Speaking Countries only - during the puritanical period of the 19th century. pre-germ theory medicine."

See: http://www.nndb.com/people/018/000133616/

"Dr John Harvey Kellogg became chief physician at the Western Health
Reform Institute of Battle Creek, a home for healthy diet and
lifestyle that had been founded by Seventh Day Adventist leader Ellen
G. White in 1866."

Dr John Kellogg was an early American medical Eugenicist who was a
Seventh Day Adventist, and advocated eating his Kellogg's corn flakes
and circumcision of all male babies.

Here is something else connected to the Eugenics movement - legalized abortion in the United States. 

http://consistent-life.org/blog/index.php/2018/04/03/eugenics-roe-v-wade/

"The 1973 Supreme Court decisions that ended all legal protection of unborn children were based on eugenics. Despite that, comments about the decisions usually focus on privacy and women’s rights, not on eugenics. So we should look carefully at the ways in which eugenics shows up in the decisions.

"The appearance of eugenics in the abortion decisions that is easiest to see is the reference in a footnote to Buck v. Bell, the 1927 case that opened the floodgates for sterilizing people who were considered to be unfit. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects a “right to privacy” and that the decision to have an abortion is an exercise of this right. But, the Court stated, the right to privacy is not absolute; it can be limited in some cases, such as vaccination and sterilization. So the abortion decision was not about women’s rights; it cited a case permitting forced sterilization."

"The abortion decisions were written by Justice Harry Blackmun. His approach to abortion follows the lead of Glanville Williams. Glanville Williams, who taught law at Cambridge University, was a member of the Eugenics Society. In 1954, the Eugenics Society voted to support the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA), which set out to remove legal restrictions against abortion. Williams became president of the ALRA from 1962, and was successful within a few years; the British law was changed in 1967."

http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm

"The influence on the eugenicists on abortion in America is perhaps
best seen by comparing Roe v. Wade and a book by Professor Glanville
Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. The book is cited
repeatedly in the 1973 abortion decision, but the numerous citations
do not reveal the full extent of the influence. Justice Blackmun
lifted his whole argument from Williams, including the history of
abortion, ancient attitudes, the influence of Christianity, common
law, Augustine's and Aquinas' teaching, canon law and English
statutory law. And Williams was a member of the Eugenics Society. Roe v. Wade was based on eugenics.

I believe this has been tried before,,(i.e. Hitler, etc.)

Blade

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary
Good

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary

guest8

  • Guest


wow for someone who is without faith in Jesus Christ and His Promises, this w2ould be a devastating film.

Blade
Agree Agree x 1 View List

bernardpyron

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 94
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 14
    Badges: (View All)
    Fourth year Anniversary
Is the U.S. Under God's Judgment Because of Years of Unrepented Abortion?

Bernard Pyron

http://consistent-life.org/blog/index.php/2018/04/03/eugenics-roe-v-wade/

"The 1973 Supreme Court decisions that ended all legal protection of unborn children were based on eugenics. Despite that, comments about the decisions usually focus on privacy and women’s rights, not on eugenics. So we should look carefully at the ways in which eugenics shows up in the decisions.

"The appearance of eugenics in the abortion decisions that is easiest to see is the reference in a footnote to Buck v. Bell, the 1927 case that opened the floodgates for sterilizing people who were considered to be unfit. In Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court said that the Constitution protects a “right to privacy” and that the decision to have an abortion is an exercise of this right. But, the Court stated, the right to privacy is not absolute; it can be limited in some cases, such as vaccination and sterilization. So the abortion decision was not about women’s rights; it cited a case permitting forced sterilization."

"The abortion decisions were written by Justice Harry Blackmun. His approach to abortion follows the lead of Glanville Williams. Glanville Williams, who taught law at Cambridge University, was a member of the Eugenics Society. In 1954, the Eugenics Society voted to support the Abortion Law Reform Association (ALRA), which set out to remove legal restrictions against abortion. Williams became president of the ALRA from 1962, and was successful within a few years; the British law was changed in 1967."

http://www.emmerich1.com/EUGENICS.htm

"The influence on the eugenicists on abortion in America is perhaps
best seen by comparing Roe v. Wade and a book by Professor Glanville
Williams, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law. The book is cited
repeatedly in the 1973 abortion decision, but the numerous citations
do not reveal the full extent of the influence. Justice Blackmun
lifted his whole argument from Williams, including the history of
abortion, ancient attitudes, the influence of Christianity, common
law, Augustine's and Aquinas' teaching, canon law and English
statutory law. And Williams was a member of the Eugenics Society. Roe v. Wade was based on eugenics,"
« Last Edit: February 03, 2021, 06:14:38 am by bernardpyron »
Informative Informative x 1 View List

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
66 Replies
10567 Views
Last post July 07, 2022, 11:08:58 pm
by patrick jane
61 Replies
2213 Views
Last post March 01, 2021, 08:56:26 pm
by patrick jane
Late Term Abortion Law

Started by guest17 « 1 2 3 4 5 » Politics

54 Replies
10307 Views
Last post June 28, 2022, 07:41:33 am
by patrick jane
2 Replies
1117 Views
Last post March 02, 2021, 03:19:47 pm
by patrick jane
32 Replies
1451 Views
Last post January 05, 2021, 07:16:19 pm
by patrick jane

+-Recent Topics

Pre-Conception Existence - an intro by patrick jane
February 10, 2024, 07:42:15 am

Best Of | Tattooed Theist Ministry by patrick jane
February 06, 2024, 08:58:08 pm

Corinth by patrick jane
February 06, 2024, 08:56:41 pm

Prayer Forum by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 08:10:29 am

Robert Sepehr Scientist by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 08:04:18 am

Lion Of Judah by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 07:23:59 am

Scriptures - Verse Of The Day and Discussion by patrick jane
August 23, 2023, 05:15:09 am

The Underworld by patrick jane
June 06, 2023, 07:01:04 am

Your Favorite Music, Images and Memes by patrick jane
June 06, 2023, 03:36:53 am

Did Jesus Die on a Friday - Comments by rstrats
April 23, 2023, 01:39:22 pm

ROBERT SEPEHR - ANTHROPOLOGY - Myths and Mythology by patrick jane
April 23, 2023, 09:08:00 am

The Greatest Sermons by patrick jane
April 16, 2023, 04:27:45 am

Who am I? | Tattooed Theist (Channel Trailer) by patrick jane
April 13, 2023, 09:31:23 pm

Biblical Flat Earth and Cosmos by patrick jane
April 13, 2023, 05:18:58 am

Common Figure of Speech/Colloquial Language? by rstrats
April 06, 2023, 02:57:38 pm

Jon Rappoport On The "Vaccine" by bernardpyron
December 11, 2022, 11:43:44 am

Mark & La Shonda Songwriting by guest131
November 20, 2022, 10:35:08 pm

Christ Is Able To Transform Individuals, Bernard Pyron by bernardpyron
November 13, 2022, 12:36:04 am