When a subject needs to be silenced the Royals have their legal or illegal ways.
Murder of Princess Diana – Doctor Mailliez replacedThe murder of Lady Diana in 1997 got a lot of attention, how could anybody believe that the chauffeur of a multimillionaire would cause a fatal traffic accident?
The first medical doctor on the scene of the crash was Doctor Frederic Mailliez (who arrived on the scene with his friend Mark Butt), who provided Diana with first aid in the Alma tunnel.
Mailliez provided Diana with oxygen as he concluded that she had problems breathing, because of the position of her body and that she was unconscious. He further stated that she didn’t look badly injured and expected that she would survive.
This photograph was published in Italy, and placed on the Princess-diana-murder.blogspot.nl above the text: “
Dr. Mailliez supplies with oxygen Princess Diana, slightly injured, while CNN & Co. "seriously" set the stage for the murder, while allowing a glimpse at the horrible truth”.
Lady Di doesn’t appear to have life threatening injuries:
http://img191.imageshack.us/img191/74/e56g.jpgYou can hear Frederic Mailliez say this in the documentary "
Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" (2007).
11:04 – 11:20: she [Diana] didn’t have any blood on her face, but she was unconscious and her head was down like that and she had difficulty to breathe, so she needed some assistance very quickly.
15:56 – 16:06: I thought this beautiful woman had a good chance to live because I thought it was just a head injury.
Mailliez potentially was a dangerous medical expert to contradict the official story.
The following documentary “
Who killed Diana?” (2014) features another “Frederic Mailliez” from 6:42 – 6:52 and 9:16 – 9:27, who saw only a “little blood” - video was deleted:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dANWdysaoF0The real Mailliez uses a lot of hand gestures and a lot of facial expression, including frowning with his eyebrows. The fake blue eyed actor doesn’t imitate this very well.
Also noticeable is that the real (French) Mailliez has difficulties with English, but the fake blue eyed actor doesn’t imitate this good (I believe he’s an English actor speaking with a French accent).
I’ve made 2 screenshots, that you can see below, on the left is Doctor Frédéric Mailliez from "
Diana: The Witnesses In The Tunnel" (2007), on the right is the “Doctor Mailliez” from the video “
Who killed Diana?” (2014).
First look at the colour of their eyes: Mailliez had brown eyes; the replacement actor has blue eyes!
The upper lip of the blue eyed actor is much wider than of the “real” Mailliez.
Another noticeable difference is that the eyebrows of the blue eyed replacement are lighter and have a different shape.
The blue eyed actor looks younger, while this video is from a later date (7 years?).
Mailliez had more of an upward nose than the blue eyed actor.
They also have a different skin colour, which isn’t only a sun tan.
https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1076Fiona Barnett – Candy GirlIn December 2017, I looked for information on the whereabouts of Fiona Barnett, who has been reported “missing” several times...
I’ve posted earlier about Fiona exposing an elite paedophile ring for (sexual) abuse and ritual murders:
https://3169.createaforum.com/firestarter-on-fire/child-trafficking-by-cps-and-hhs/msg12154/#msg12154Following is an interesting October 2015 story in 2 parts by Barnett after her documentary –
Candy Girl – was released.
Barnett describes being accused of murdering the Nazi Peter Holowczak, who died in Sidney of a reported “suicide”, when Barnett was in Brisbane.
Her therapist Nerida Saunders was stalked. The stalkers subsequently followed Fiona to her daughter’s primary school. Saunders reported this to the police.
In May 2014, Barnett reported multiple crimes of child sex trafficking, abduction,
**** and murder to the cops. Detective Terry Frost simply omitted many of the crimes involving perpetrators who have since died.
60 Minutes discovered the identity of the man Fiona and her siblings called "
Dr Mark" - Leonas Petrauskas. Fiona’s Nazi grandmother was friends with Petrauskas, who was involved in the ritual abuse.
One woman told Barnett she was another victim of Petrauskas, who referred her for deep sleep treatment with Harry Bailey at the Chelmsford private hospital.
The researchers of
60 Minutes found another perpetrator — a woman who assisted Petrauskas while he performed an abortion on Fiona. This woman had also murdered a young male surfer at a remote Kurnell beach:
https://independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/fiona-barnett--candy-girl,8248On 24 December 2014, Fiona Barnett was forced to surrender her license to carry a gun or face possible criminal charges.
Her next door neighbour threatened Barnett with the words "
I should have killed that dog! I’m gonna kill that dog!" (he was referring to Barnett’s dog).
At this instance, Fiona was helped by her friend and ex-police officer, Amanda Prosser, who intervened and made her neighbour leave her property. Prosser called the police:
https://independentaustralia.net/life/life-display/fiona-barnett-candy-girl-and-the-police,8292When I searched for more information on Amanda Gabriel Prosser, the trail leads to a member of Davidicke.com
Amanda Gabriel; that is (or was?) Prosser...
I found Prosser’s facebook page, which has since been placed behind a password.
On 15 September 2014, on Prosser’s facebook page a story on Anthony Kidman dying oversees was posted:
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1464359523852544&id=1425381074417056The next post was 25 January 2016, with a link to a story in which Fiona Barnett isn’t even mentioned:
https://wakeup-world.com/2016/01/25/shedding-light-child-abuse-whistleblower-takes-a-stand/The last posts by
Amanda Gabriel on Davidicke.com with the keyword “
Fiona” were made in November 2015 – the “archived”, frozen Forum.davidicke.com has (also) been taken offline for the last couple of days (in March it was still online):
https://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?p=1062613688#post1062613688See quotes from Amanda Gabriel’s posts on 2 and 8 November 2015.
Our Friend Fiona Barnett is now in hiding after having her life threatened yesterday. As I was speaking on a live radio interview Fiona was making Police statements in Sydney. She was followed by two people she refers to as "thugs" and has retreated into hiding for her safety.
She was run off the road while driving a few days earlier. For anyone who has been introduced to Fiona via her Child Abuse information and evidence - you will know she is extremely courageous.
Fiona Barnett is safe at home. She was intimidated and harassed by "thugs" who were no doubt "employed" to frighten her. She had to actually run and hide and avoid two cars that were following and circling. I am sure in time Fiona will share the details.
The other positive aspect is that Fiona has provided a Police statement to Sydney (NSW Australia) detectives. The information and evidence is relevant to her recent mainstream media press address - what transpired was that Police took notice and acted.
Fiona now has a gag order in place - so she can no longer speak publicly about the information and evidence that has been included in her Police statement.
Since November 2015 not much was heard of Fiona Barnett...
Then in December 2017, a video was uploaded by Sgt report, featuring Fiona Barnett.
I’m not sure, but my impression is that the Fiona Barnett in this video is younger, has less wrinkles and a different nose...
The voice is very similar, but the Fiona in the video has almost no facial expression.
What’s up with that cap? That could be to hide how she looks!
Judge for yourself...
The first picture is Fiona in October 2015 (so more than 4 1/2 years ago).
The second is (a blow up of) a screenprint from the posted video (less than 2 1/2 years ago)...
Crimes against humanity against Canadian childrenThe genocide on Native American children in Catholic residential schools in Canada from the end of the nineteenth century on is well-documented. It is estimated that some 50,000 children were killed, while also a lot of potential mothers were sterilised.
Much of this information was compiled by the
In the following PDF, you can read that the Canadian government (of Queen Elizabeth) together with the Catholic Church has been trying to exterminate all Native Americans (for a final solution).
On April 12, 1910 D.C. Scott declared:
It is readily acknowledged that Indian children lose their natural resistance to illness by habitating so closely in these schools, and that they die at a much higher rate than in their villages. But this alone does not justify a change in the policy of this Department, which is geared towards the final solution of our Indian Problem.
http://canadiangenocide.nativeweb.org/genocide.pdfIt was Kevin Annett, who compiled the previous information, which is a thorough documented, researched piece.
It is claimed that the same Kevin Annett headed the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State (ITCCS) on the crimes against humanity by the “ninth circle”. The ITCCS stories are sloppy, often with misspelled names of the elite perpetrators, to make it more difficult to find them with a search engine.
Many witnesses/victims that would testify for the ITCCS, died very suddenly. Could it be that the ITCCS was established to find and silence witnesses of these crimes against humanity?
More on the crimes against humanity against children in Canada, colony of England – the ten thousands Duplessis’ orphans, that were sentenced to mental diseases in Canada in the 1940s and 1950s.
They were named after former Quebec Prime Minister Maurice Duplessis. Already in 1962 the Bedard Commission acknowledged that one-third of the 22,000 psychiatric patients were wrongly institutionalised.
These children were simply told one day that they were retards, didn’t get any schooling and had to perform slave labour. As if this wasn’t enough they got corporal punishment, experimental anti-psychotics (like Chlorpromazine), ECT, lobotomies, and were sexually molested. Medical records were falsified to hide the evidence.
The orphanages were stimulated to declare these children insane because the government paid only $1.25 a day for orphans, but $2.75 a day for psychiatric patients. In 1999, Léo-Paul Lauzon and Martin Poirier estimated that Christian groups received $70 million in subsidies (measured in 1999 dollars) by claiming children as "mentally deficient" while the government saved $37 million by changing one of its orphanages from educational institution to psychiatric hospital.
In 2001 the Canadian government offered 10,000 dollar plus an additional 1000 dollar for each year spent in an asylum, only, to surviving orphans that got lobotomies (1,500 people qualified for compensation) and in 2006 they provided an additional $26 million compensation. To put this in perspective: this is less than the orphanages got in the first place, while 1000 dollar a year amounts to 2.76 dollar per day of torture.
Not one of the psychiatrists and child care workers that participated in the torture of these children were charged in a criminal case.
These are the responsible Governor Generals from 1946 till 1974 (in between brackets the years in which they were appointed): The Viscount Alexander of Tunis (1946), Vincent Massey (1952), Georges Vanier (1959), and Roland Michener (1967-1974):
http://www.freedommag.org/english/vol37i1/page04.htmhttp://historyofrights.ca/encyclopaedia/main-events/duplessis-orphans/