+- +-

+- User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 114
Latest: Hazard
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 32986
Total Topics: 1301
Most Online Today: 81
Most Online Ever: 46271
(March 28, 2021, 08:01:47 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 2661
Total: 2661

Author Topic: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes  (Read 5510 times)

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

Scotty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 11
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« on: August 02, 2018, 09:25:40 am »



John 3:16 is the most well known verse there is and yet many misinterpret it. Whatever shall or should we believe?

NIV -  John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him [shall] not perish but have eternal life."

KJV- John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him [should] not perish but have everlasting life."


« Last Edit: May 11, 2020, 09:42:51 pm by patrick jane »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Like Like x 1 Love Love x 1 View List

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Should/Shall
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2018, 11:00:15 am »
John 3:16 is the most well known verse there is and yet many misinterpret it. Whatever shall or should we believe?

NIV -  John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him [shall] not perish but have eternal life."

KJV- John 3:16, "For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him [should] not perish but have everlasting life."
Personally, I'm a King James Bible reader and the NIV has countless word errors and changes. But I think I like the NIV for John 3:16. Thank you Chaplain Scotty !!!
« Last Edit: August 02, 2018, 11:03:04 am by patrick jane »
Like Like x 2 View List

Scotty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 11
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 3
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2018, 08:37:43 am »
I do believe Romans 8:38-39 That nothing shall separate us.

I use KJV as well which interrupts it as "should" However we know that a true "born again" child of God is secure in His righteous right hand   It is the original LIFELOCK :]
Like Like x 4 View List

guest2

  • Guest
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2018, 03:22:10 am »
I reckon so.


Love Love x 2 View List

Billy Evmur

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 221
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Referrals: 0
    • Dove on a distant oak tree

  • Total Badges: 17
    Badges: (View All)
    Second year Anniversary
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #4 on: August 15, 2018, 05:35:17 am »
What makes the difference between modern translators and the KJV is the theology of the translators.

The sets of translators had two different [sometimes opposite] theological understanding, consequently they interpreted according to these theological stances

The KJV translators were Puritan and Calvinist, the moderns are Arminians, you see the arguments in the forums how WIDE the divide is in the opinion and outlook.

To get the best of the KJV you have to understand 17th century usage of the English language...should does not mean mebbe, it is past perfect of shall, would is past perfect of will etc
Have faith in God
Like Like x 2 View List

Sasha

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 58
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Global Moderator
  • Referrals: 0

  • Total Badges: 16
    Badges: (View All)
    Level 4
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #5 on: August 15, 2018, 09:06:02 am »
What makes the difference between modern translators and the KJV is the theology of the translators.

The sets of translators had two different [sometimes opposite] theological understanding, consequently they interpreted according to these theological stances

The KJV translators were Puritan and Calvinist, the moderns are Arminians, you see the arguments in the forums how WIDE the divide is in the opinion and outlook.

To get the best of the KJV you have to understand 17th century usage of the English language...should does not mean mebbe, it is past perfect of shall, would is past perfect of will etc


This could explain why I have to study using interlinear aids and 30+ translations when seriously pondering things.  To be sincere, I am neither Calvinist (Scripture forces me to conform otherwise) nor Armenian (Again, scripture shows God actively pursuing all humanity till the final alter call), so I’m forced to search out matters apart from either of those rival camps.

John 13:13 You call me Teacher and Lord, and you are right, for so I am

Matthew 23:8 "But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers.

1 Corinthians 1:12 What I mean is this: One of you says, “I follow Paul”; another, “I follow Apollos”; another, “I follow Cephas”; still another, “I follow Christ.”

13 Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized in the name of Paul? 14 I thank God that I did not baptize any of you except Crispus and Gaius, 15 so no one can say that you were baptized in my name. 16 (Yes, I also baptized the household of Stephanas; beyond that, I don’t remember if I baptized anyone else.) 17 For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the gospel—not with wisdom and eloquence, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power.

Matthew 15:9 They worship Me in vain; they teach as doctrine the precepts of men.’”

The list of scriptures go on, but my point is Calvin and Arminius we’re people.

Acts 11:26 has us to be named of Christ’s namesake, if we name ourselves, but why people side with Larry, Moe or Curly always blows my mind.  God walked among us and people try to pierce the veil of mystery, not with the red letters, but with fallible man’s opinions.

People who had fractured by following men and building on other men’s words and opinions literally rejected God to His Face.

A big part of me wishes all the big labels would be flushed down the spiritual gnat and camel soup disposal, and people would simply give a rats patoot what each person perceives. 

Theological bricks in a conformity wall?  No way.  But bricks of Jesus, mortared together by Jesus’ Love and selflessness, while retaining our unique ability to voice different perspectives... well, absolutely, sign me up!

Spoiler (hover to show)
« Last Edit: August 15, 2018, 12:19:12 pm by Sasha »
I'm Hot !!!

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2018, 05:32:00 am »
Fifteen Myths about Bible Translation


https://danielbwallace.com/2012/10/08/fifteen-myths-about-bible-translation/

ON 8 OCTOBER 2012 BY DANIEL B. WALLACEIN BIBLE TRANSLATION


Perhaps the number one myth about Bible translation is that a word-for-word translation is the best kind. Anyone who is conversant in more than one language recognizes that a word-for-word translation is simply not possible if one is going to communicate in an understandable way in the receptor language. Yet, ironically, even some biblical scholars who should know better continue to tout word-for-word translations as though they were the best. Perhaps the most word-for-word translation of the Bible in English is Wycliffe’s, done in the 1380s. Although translated from the Latin Vulgate, it was a slavishly literal translation to that text. And precisely because of this, it was hardly English.
Similar to the first point is that a literal translation is the best version. In fact, this is sometimes just a spin on the first notion. For example, the Greek New Testament has about 138,000–140,000 words, depending on which edition one is using. But no English translation has this few. Here are some examples:
RSV           173,293

NIV           175,037

ESV           175,599

NIV 2011   176,122

TNIV        176,267

NRSV       176,417

REB          176,705

NKJV      177,980

NET         178,929

RV           179,873

ASV        180,056

KJV        180,565

NASB 95   182,446

NASB      184,062

NLT, 2nd ed  186,596

TEV         192,784

It’s no surprise that the TEV and NLT have the most words, since these are both paraphrases. But the translations perceived to be more literal are often near the bottom of this list (that is, farther away from the Greek NT word-count). These include the KJV (#12), ASV (#11), NASB (#14), NASB 95 (#13), and RV (#10). Indeed, when the RV came out (1881), one of its stated goals was to be quite literal and the translators were consciously trying to be much more literal than the KJV.

Some translations of the New Testament into other languages:

Modern Hebrew NT             111,154

Vulgate                                    125,720

Italian La Sacra Bibbia      163,870

Luther                                     169,536

French Novelle Version2   184,449

La Sainte Bible (Geneve)    185,859

3.    The King James Version is a literal translation. The preface to the KJV actually claims otherwise. For example, they explicitly said that they did not translate the same word in the original the same way in the English but did attempt to capture the sense of the original each time: “An other thing we thinke good to admonish thee of (gentle Reader) that wee have not tyed our selves to an uniformitie of phrasing, or to an identitie of words, as some peradventure would wish that we had done, because they observe, that some learned men some where, have beene as exact as they could that way.

Truly, that we might not varie from the sense of that which we had translated before, if the word signified the same thing in both places (for there bee some wordes that bee not of the same sense every where) we were especially carefull, and made a conscience, according to our duetie.”

4.    The King James Version is perfect. This myth continues to be promoted today, yet even the translators of the KJV were not sure on hundreds of occasions which rendering was best, allowing the reader to decide for himself. Again, the preface notes: “Therfore as S. Augustine saith, that varietie of Translations is profitable for the finding out of the sense of the Scriptures: so diversitie of signification and sense in the margine, where the text is not so cleare, must needes doe good, yea is necessary, as we are perswaded… They that are wise, had rather have their judgements at libertie in differences of readings, then to be captivated to one, when it may be the other.”

The original KJV had approximately 8000 marginal notes, though these have been stripped out in modern printings of the Authorized Version. Further, some of the typos and blatant errors of the 1611 KJV have continued to remain in the text after multiple corrections and spelling updates (weighing in at more than 100,000 changes) through the 1769 edition. For example, in Matthew 23.24 the KJV says, “Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.”

The Greek means “strain out a gnat.” Or the wording of Hebrews 4.8, which says, “For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.” Instead of ‘Jesus,’ Joshua is meant. It’s the same word in Greek, but the reader of the text will hardly think of Joshua when he or she sees ‘Jesus’ here since ‘Joshua’ is found everywhere in the OT.

5.    The King James Version was hard to understand when it was first published. Again, the preface: “But we desire that the Scripture may speake like it selfe, as in the language of Canaan, that it may bee understood even of the very vulgar.” The reality is that the KJV was intended to be easily understood, yet today this 400-year-old version is difficult to comprehend in all too many passages.

6.     There has never been an authorized revision of the KJV. There were three overhauls of the KJV up through 1769, involving more than 100,000 changes (the vast majority of which merely spelling updates). The KJV that is used today is almost always the 1769 revision. And the Revised Version of 1885 was an authorized revision of the KJV. It used a different Greek text than the KJV New Testament had done.

 7.    The Apocrypha are books found only in Roman Catholic Bibles. Although the Apocrypha—or what Catholics call the Deutero-canonical books—are an intrinsic part of Roman Catholic translations of scripture, a number of Protestant Bibles also include them. Even the King James Bible, a distinctly Protestant version, included the Apocrypha in every printing until the middle of the nineteenth century. To be sure, the apocryphal books were placed at the end of the Old Testament, to set them apart (unlike in Roman Catholic Bibles), but they were nevertheless included.

8.    Homosexuals influenced the translation of the NIV. It is true that a woman who later admitted to being a lesbian was a style-editor of the NIV originally, but according to Dr. Ken Barker, one-time editor of the NIV, she had zero say on the content of the NIV.

9.   No translation can claim to be the word of God except the King James Bible. It may seem as though we are beating a dead horse, but the KJV-Only crowd is persistent and continues to exercise an inordinate role in some circles. In the preface to the KJV, the translators noted that the king’s speech is still the king’s speech even when translated into other languages. Further, even poor translations of the Bible deserved to be called the word of God according to the preface to the KJV. And yet, in all particulars, only the original Greek and Hebrew text can be regarded as the word of God. Something is always lost in translation. Always.

10.    Modern translations have removed words and verses from the Bible. Most biblical scholars—both conservative and liberal—would say instead that the KJV added words and verses, rather than that the modern ones have removed such. And this is in part because the oldest and most reliable manuscripts lack the extra verses that are found in the KJV.

11.    Essential doctrines are in jeopardy in modern translations. Actually, no doctrine essential for salvation is affected by translations, modern or ancient—unless done by a particular cult for its own purposes. For example, those Englishmen who signed the Westminster Confession of Faith in the seventeenth century were using the KJV, yet it is still a normative doctrinal statement that millions of Protestants sign today even though they use modern translations.

12.    “Young woman” in the RSV’s translation of Isaiah 7.14 was due to liberal bias. Actually, ‘young woman’ is the most accurate translation of the Hebrew word ‘almah. Although this created quite a stir in 1952 when the RSV was published, even the NET Bible, done by evangelicals, has ‘young woman’ here. The TEV, REB, and NJB also have ‘young woman’ here. And it is a marginal reading found in the NIV 2011, TNIV, and NLT. The NRSV has a marginal note that indicates that the Greek translation of Isaiah 7.14 has ‘virgin’ here.

13.    Gender-inclusive translations are driven by a social agenda. In some instances, this may be the case. But not in all. The NIV 2011, for example, strives to be an accurate translation that is understandable by today’s English speaker. And the translators note that the English language is changing. In reality, the older gender-exclusive translations may miscommunicate the meaning of the Bible in today’s world if readers understand the words ‘men,’ ‘brothers,’ and the like in numerous passages to be restricted to the male gender. Translations must keep up with the evolution of the receptor language. For example, the RSV (1952) reads in Psalm 50.9, “I will accept no bull from your house.” In today’s English, that means something quite different from what the translators intended! The NRSV accordingly and appropriately renders the verse, “I will not accept a bull from your house.”

One of the great challenges in English translations of the Bible today is to avoid language that can become fodder for bathroom humor. Or, as one of the translators of the ESV once mentioned, a major challenge is to remove the ‘snicker factor.’

14.    Red-letter editions of the Bible highlight the exact words of Jesus. Scholars are not sure of the exact words of Jesus. Ancient historians were concerned to get the gist of what someone said, but not necessarily the exact wording. A comparison of parallel passages in the Synoptic Gospels reveals that the evangelists didn’t always record Jesus’ words exactly the same way. The terms ipsissima verba and ipsissima vox are used to distinguish the kinds of dominical sayings we have in the Gospels. The former means ‘the very words,’ and the latter means ‘the very voice.’

That is, the exact words or the essential thought. There have been attempts to harmonize these accounts, but they are highly motivated by a theological agenda which clouds one’s judgment and skews the facts. In truth, though red-letter editions of the Bible may give comfort to believers that they have the very words of Jesus in every instance, this is a false comfort.

15.    Chapter and verse numbers are inspired. These were added centuries later. Chapter numbers were added by Stephen Langton, the Archbishop of Canterbury, in the early 13th century. Verse numbers were not added until 1551. Robert Estienne (a.k.a. Stephanus), a Parisian printer, added verse numbers to the fourth edition of his Greek New Testament.

The pocket-sized two-volume work (which can be viewed at www.csntm.org) has three parallel columns, one in Greek and two in Latin (one Erasmus’s Latin text, the other Jerome’s). To facilitate ease of comparison, Stephanus added the verse numbers. Although most of the breaks seem natural enough, quite a few are bizarre. Neither chapter numbers nor verse numbers are inspired.





Theology Forums : https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin :  https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php
Bitchute : https://www.bitchute.com/channel/xUZJpNWUz2T4/



Hearing, believing and trusting the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross; His death, burial and resurrection, the gospel of our salvation, seals us with that Holy Spirit of Promise. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise. 2 Peter 3:9 KJV - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV - Ephesians 1:10-14 KJV - Romans 10:9-10 KJV - Romans 10:13 - Romans 10:17 - Ephesians 1:7 KJV - Colossians 1:14 KJV -

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2018, 08:55:07 pm »
Why the King James Bible


The teaching of Bible versions is one of the most misunderstood doctrines. Learn the necessary steps to understanding how we got our Bible.

Find the outline here :

http://graceambassadors.com/audio/why-the-king-james-bible





Why the King James Bible Pt 2


The Bible versions issues centers on the doctrine of preservation. Learn what God says about preserving his word and why unity in the body of Christ requires one bible.

Find the outline here :
http://graceambassadors.com/bible/why-the-king-james-bible-part-2







Theology Forums : https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin :  https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php
Bitchute : https://www.bitchute.com/channel/xUZJpNWUz2T4/



Hearing, believing and trusting the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross; His death, burial and resurrection, the gospel of our salvation, seals us with that Holy Spirit of Promise. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise. 2 Peter 3:9 KJV - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV - Ephesians 1:10-14 KJV - Romans 10:9-10 KJV - Romans 10:13 - Romans 10:17 - Ephesians 1:7 KJV - Colossians 1:14 KJV -

guest8

  • Guest
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2018, 10:55:33 pm »
Why the King James Bible


The teaching of Bible versions is one of the most misunderstood doctrines. Learn the necessary steps to understanding how we got our Bible.

Find the outline here :

http://graceambassadors.com/audio/why-the-king-james-bible






Why the King James Bible Pt 2


The Bible versions issues centers on the doctrine of preservation. Learn what God says about preserving his word and why unity in the body of Christ requires one bible.

Find the outline here :
http://graceambassadors.com/bible/why-the-king-james-bible-part-2







Theology Forums : https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin :  https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php
Bitchute : https://www.bitchute.com/channel/xUZJpNWUz2T4/



Hearing, believing and trusting the finished work of Jesus Christ on the cross; His death, burial and resurrection, the gospel of our salvation, seals us with that Holy Spirit of Promise. The Lord is not slack concerning His promise. 2 Peter 3:9 KJV - 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV - Ephesians 1:10-14 KJV - Romans 10:9-10 KJV - Romans 10:13 - Romans 10:17 - Ephesians 1:7 KJV - Colossians 1:14 KJV -


There are many books out there telling WHY the King James version
is the only book to follow. It is simple. All but one (the King James Version) comes from the Alexander codecies. The Codecies are the oldest and most complete  manuscripts there is today. However, Alexander was the home of the Gnostics and many scriptures were taken away and many were added at a later time. Westcott and Hort uses the bibles written from these codecies and we all know what they did.

With so many Bibles out there, how do you tell if your Bible is telling you the Word of GOD!

By comparison. Yes, it is a slow method but one that is telling!.

Satan's affect on the Bible is to remove specific words to create doubt, to change our minds and to remove Jesus Christ and His Gospel from sight. How does He do this? Simple, change a word here and there and soon your telling a story without Jesus  Christ which many today believe. Here are a few of them that will get you started? I will compare the KJV with the worst of them all yet, is use the most around the world. The NIV

The Deity of Christ.

1 Tm 3:16(KJV)..."And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory."

Above God ( is Manifest in the FLESH) Jesus Christ--is GOD!

1 Tim 3:16 (NIV).."Beyond all question, the mystery from which true godliness springs is great: He appeared in the flesh, was vindicated by the Spirit,[fn] was seen by angels, was preached among the nations, was believed on in the world, was taken up in glory."

The the example above "HE (who is HE)appeared in Flesh". He is not GOD!

Notice also the differences in "vindicated BY the Spirit" is a whole world of difference than being "Justified in the SPirit"

Lets do another:John 9:35

(KJV).."Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him, he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?"

Jesus is the Son of GOD.


(NIV).."Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he found him, he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?”

Jesus is the Son of Man, not a GOD!

Ok, one more in a different category:(Salvation by Works):1 John 1:7


(KJV).."As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:"

Growing by the Word of God is something true Christians doe every day.

(NIV).."Like newborn babies, crave pure spiritual milk, so that by it you may grow up in your salvation,"

**What is Spiritual Milk?   But more importantly...."by it you may grow up in your salvation" Salvation BY WORKS

*******OK...one MORE...One that is obsure enough not to be noticed, yet it is there ! Gen 6:8

(KJV).."But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD."

When we receive God's GRACE, we receive Salvation!


(NIV).."But Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD."

When we receive God's FAVOR, What do we receive, certainly NOT Salvation!?


There are many, many more that could laid out but for lack of space I do not.

If you are reading a different version than the (KJV), then it is advisable to get a AP like Bible gate that will split the screen with two Bibles of the same scripture. Check out the differences and if your version leaves out 'Jesus Christ as God', let Satan have it back and get the real one. 

Of, course if you do not believe that Jesus is GOD or that by simply believing in His Gospel, One will receive Salvation;
and you see no reason to change because of a few word changes, then Please continue on the course you have set by and for yourself.

Blade



patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary

guest8

  • Guest
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #10 on: January 02, 2019, 08:49:45 pm »
Which Bible Translation Should We Read?


There are so many different translations out in the world. Which one is the most accurate? It is OK to read several or should we be reading only one?

15 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7qSUSvPRPw&index=11&t=0s&list=WL



PayPal Donations : https://paypal.me/ThankYou3169
Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/patrick_jane3169
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php?action=forum
Theology Forums :  https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+

In the above video, the information given was correct but it did not go far enough! Instead of presenting other evidence to the reason WHY I feel the KJV is the WORD of GOD and the others are simply copies of a Bad book.

This video is 17 minutes long and will enlighten you to the reason the God preserved His WORD in the KJV.  If you have another version, I would recommend a good such as "Strong's concordance" to test your Bible verses against the Bible verses of King James Version. If you would like to continue a discussion about the King James Bible vs other versions, simply reply using the  "QUOTE" in the upper right corner of this post. 

Here is the link for the AV Publications. They can give you more information and more verses that are totally different from the King James. http://www.avpublications.com/avnew/home.html

 ENJOY.

Blade





Winner Winner x 1 View List

patrick jane

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 24384
  • Karma: +1010/-0
  • Research Jesus Christ - Research Flat Earth
  • Location: Homeless in God's Flat Earth
  • Referrals: 48
    • Theology Forums

  • Total Badges: 39
    Badges: (View All)
    Fifth year Anniversary
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #11 on: January 02, 2019, 08:58:39 pm »
Which Bible Translation Should We Read?


There are so many different translations out in the world. Which one is the most accurate? It is OK to read several or should we be reading only one?

15 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7qSUSvPRPw&index=11&t=0s&list=WL



PayPal Donations : https://paypal.me/ThankYou3169
Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/patrick_jane3169
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php?action=forum
Theology Forums :  https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+

In the above video, the information given was correct but it did not go far enough! Instead of presenting other evidence to the reason WHY I feel the KJV is the WORD of GOD and the others are simply copies of a Bad book.

This video is 17 minutes long and will enlighten you to the reason the God preserved His WORD in the KJV.  If you have another version, I would recommend a good such as "Strong's concordance" to test your Bible verses against the Bible verses of King James Version. If you would like to continue a discussion about the King James Bible vs other versions, simply reply using the  "QUOTE" in the upper right corner of this post. 

Here is the link for the AV Publications. They can give you more information and more verses that are totally different from the King James. http://www.avpublications.com/avnew/home.html

 ENJOY.

Blade



I will watch this video, thank you. I use only the KJV now since 2012. Also when I post scripture it is always King James 1900

guest8

  • Guest
Re: Bible Versions, Interpretations and Word Changes
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2019, 10:00:59 pm »
Which Bible Translation Should We Read?


There are so many different translations out in the world. Which one is the most accurate? It is OK to read several or should we be reading only one?

15 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7qSUSvPRPw&index=11&t=0s&list=WL



PayPal Donations : https://paypal.me/ThankYou3169
Patreon : https://www.patreon.com/patrick_jane3169
Flat Earth Forums : https://3169.createaforum.com/index.php?action=forum
Theology Forums :  https://theologyforums.com/index.php
Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCpzjN3dF-_PnAc81SQVjqhg?view_as=subscriber
Pinterest : https://www.pinterest.com/patrickjane3169/
Google : https://plus.google.com/u/0/113527239869543729835
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-jane-833769164/
Twitter : https://twitter.com/patrickjane3169
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100007669219364+

In the above video, the information given was correct but it did not go far enough! Instead of presenting other evidence to the reason WHY I feel the KJV is the WORD of GOD and the others are simply copies of a Bad book.

This video is 17 minutes long and will enlighten you to the reason the God preserved His WORD in the KJV.  If you have another version, I would recommend a good such as "Strong's concordance" to test your Bible verses against the Bible verses of King James Version. If you would like to continue a discussion about the King James Bible vs other versions, simply reply using the  "QUOTE" in the upper right corner of this post. 

Here is the link for the AV Publications. They can give you more information and more verses that are totally different from the King James. http://www.avpublications.com/avnew/home.html

 ENJOY.

Blade



I will watch this video, thank you. I use only the KJV now since 2012. Also when I post scripture it is always King James 1900

I urge everyone to check out the copyright date of your Bible vs the Printing date.. WHY? The original King James Bible 1611 had no such copyright. How can one copyright the WORD of GOD?

The Modern versions including the King James Version are copyrighted. However, Unlike the other versions, the copyright of the King James version is strictly for the notes, textual comments, maps, etc. ONLY.

To apply for a copyright, one has to only change 10-15% of the Bible. In most other version this change also includes changing of God's WORD to include, deleting , adding, etc. words or in some cases several verses. (i.e. last 12 verses of Mark 16:*(9-20).. )

What is amazing, my KJV study Bible includes a note that these verses may have been added at a later date. To be sure, they were there to start with but the Gnostics at Alexandria remove them. Even though this Study Bible (KJV) has printed those verses as the last 12 verses of Mark 16, It still has that NOTE. It would seem that Satan has taken another step to remove the KJV from everybody's wishlist.   

While I have several other Bibles, (KJV) all, they are of earlier printings and do not have the notes, maps, etc. and Yes, they do have the missing verses of Mark without comment. NO, They have no copyrights.

Satan it seems,  will stop at nothing to thwart God's WORD or Plan.

Blade 

Winner Winner x 1 View List

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
82 Replies
4830 Views
Last post May 27, 2021, 04:46:04 pm
by patrick jane
4 Replies
1810 Views
Last post May 27, 2021, 04:46:42 pm
by patrick jane
7 Replies
1902 Views
Last post October 06, 2020, 09:31:45 am
by patrick jane
11 Replies
1157 Views
Last post March 02, 2021, 02:53:33 pm
by patrick jane
0 Replies
4234 Views
Last post March 31, 2020, 10:42:21 pm
by guest8

+-Recent Topics

Pre-Conception Existence - an intro by patrick jane
February 10, 2024, 07:42:15 am

Best Of | Tattooed Theist Ministry by patrick jane
February 06, 2024, 08:58:08 pm

Corinth by patrick jane
February 06, 2024, 08:56:41 pm

Prayer Forum by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 08:10:29 am

Robert Sepehr Scientist by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 08:04:18 am

Lion Of Judah by patrick jane
September 06, 2023, 07:23:59 am

Scriptures - Verse Of The Day and Discussion by patrick jane
August 23, 2023, 05:15:09 am

The Underworld by patrick jane
June 06, 2023, 07:01:04 am

Your Favorite Music, Images and Memes by patrick jane
June 06, 2023, 03:36:53 am

Did Jesus Die on a Friday - Comments by rstrats
April 23, 2023, 01:39:22 pm

ROBERT SEPEHR - ANTHROPOLOGY - Myths and Mythology by patrick jane
April 23, 2023, 09:08:00 am

The Greatest Sermons by patrick jane
April 16, 2023, 04:27:45 am

Who am I? | Tattooed Theist (Channel Trailer) by patrick jane
April 13, 2023, 09:31:23 pm

Biblical Flat Earth and Cosmos by patrick jane
April 13, 2023, 05:18:58 am

Common Figure of Speech/Colloquial Language? by rstrats
April 06, 2023, 02:57:38 pm

Jon Rappoport On The "Vaccine" by bernardpyron
December 11, 2022, 11:43:44 am

Mark & La Shonda Songwriting by guest131
November 20, 2022, 10:35:08 pm

Christ Is Able To Transform Individuals, Bernard Pyron by bernardpyron
November 13, 2022, 12:36:04 am